Right now I’m just making a quick post because I am swamped with things to do after my web host finally shut-off my services (and did I ask them to shut off my hosting and stop charging me for it, SIX MONTHS AGO).
I’ve been documenting what I’m doing to get caught-up at http://www.Blare.Info/ – but I have a long way to go, yet, and I better get some sleep before I go into work again tonight.
I thought this freelancing stuff meant I would have FREE Time, but NO!
March 8, 2012
Posted by domainating |
Brands, Business, Computing, Domain Names, Internet, The Human Condition, Web Hosting | busy, freelancing, swamped, web host, web hosting, websites down, work |
Leave a Comment
I’ve been so busy updating domain names and websites. I have a bad host that is costing Me a great deal for the account. I really liked the hosting, even though they were so expensive, until they made a big deal about my Top Sites script and shut down the site. That’s the one I was paying them to handle. I can get all sorts of other hosts to handle the other domains at almost no cost to Me.
What sites have I been updating? I’ve been trying to get lots of domains and websites moved off the old host. So I’m not doing too much. But here’s a list:
http://www.4gz.net/
http://www.4gz.us/
http://www.abitofallright.com/ – Actually, I messed this one up. I still have to go back and fix the a names.
http://www.adgtw.com/
http://www.adtda.com/
http://amanshomeishiscastle.com/
http://automotivesalvageyards.com/
http://www.derivant.com/
http://www.designerartist.com/
http://www.domainance.com/
http://www.domainants.com/
http://www.domainperfection.com/
http://www.poetlike.com/
http://www.superelegance.com/
Aside from moving them off that expensive server so that I can close that web hosting reseller account, I am trying to get these sites to look good on a mobile phone screen. Let me know if I need to address any particular site. I actually have a Droid X with an HD aspect screen that most websites actually look pretty good on.
February 2, 2012
Posted by domainating |
Brands, Devices, Domain Names, The Human Condition, Web Hosting | busy, changing, design, Domain Names, Domains, hosts, mobile phone screen, moving, servers, updates, web design, web hosting reseller account, websites |
Leave a Comment
After Twittering that FireFox 4 was incredibly slow I was met with disbelief on Twitter and elsewhere that I mentioned it. I was told how fast FF4 is, now.
I seriously do not like FireFox because it was so pathetically slow and because it ignores good user interface experience strategies. I was actually baffled how anyone would think that the thing was any faster, as it was so slow that it nearly crashed my Asus EeePC netbook.
Well, I finally fired-up that little Windows 7 netbook again yesterday and discovered what the problem is. FF4 is allowing multiple and simultaneous video streams to run all at once. What? C’MON MAN! Who the hell designs anything with multiple active video streams on the same page?
To further complicate this issue, FireFox 4 is allowing these simultaneous video streams to run even though the page it is loading isn’t active. Huh? C’MON MAN! That is uncalled for.
Why would anyone want to load multiple pages at the same time, you may ask? Why not? If you are loading a page from an African web host (which have notoriously slow connections), you may load another website in another tab while you are waiting for the African website to load over seemingly slow dial-up speeds.
This isn’t even close to being every case. I am a webmaster, a hostmaster and a web designer. As a part of my daily duties I like to insure that my sites, as well as my client’s sites, are loading as expected each day. So my “Home” page button is a collection of all the sites I have to check. I need to ensure that the various hosting solutions I am offering are performing well, that my websites are loading quickly and correctly, that my sites have not been hacked, that the system is working correctly for myself & my clientel.
As it happens, a variety of those websites each have video on them, and as a part of the marketing it loads and plays by default. Anyone may pause the play. And until FF4, only one of these sites were streaming video when the web page they reside on wasn’t active (in focus).
But FireFox 4 has changed all that. And because FF4 is loading all these different video streams in the background, the browser slows to a crawl. As I press buttons, maybe something will happen, eventually. The user interface is nearly useless. The multiple videos that are playing are completely broken-up as the system races to deliver all the data, including those out-of-focus video streams on tabs that aren’t even viewable. And it runs every single video stream as if they all needed to be run at the same time.
C’MON MAN!
As designers we can do much better jobs of designing apps that work. The user is robbed of any ability to navigate. The video stream is corrupted, the user experience is destroyed through excessive stupidity in implementation.
C’MON MOZILLA! Get your head out of its ass.
May 1, 2011
Posted by domainating |
Brands, Internet, Product Design, Sales, Software, The Human Condition, User Interface eXperience, Web Design & Development | applications, browser, browsers, FF4, firefox 4, internet, mozilla, UI, UIX, user friendliness, user interface, web, Windows 7, world wide web, worldwide web |
Leave a Comment
BApps.com is available for sale to the highest bidder at Sedo.
BApps.com Listing @ Sedo
This domain WILL BE SOLD at auction as the reserve price has been met.
The auction for BApps.com will conclude on May/05/11 @ 05:51 AM Eastern Standard Time.
When the nameservers are reset by the new owner (or the transfer authority @ Sedo), the old blog will expire. It could be replaced by another should the new owner want one at the same old address, but that, of course, will all be up to the new registrant.
I have moved a couple posts to blog.widgetdroid.com and most of the rest I have moved here to domainating.com. Still updating a few with Categories and Post Tags.
May 1, 2011
Posted by domainating |
Brands, Devices, Domain Names, Internet, Smart Devices, Software, Web Design & Development | applications, apps, Bapps, devices, hand held, mobile, smart phone, software |
1 Comment
I downloaded the new version 4 of FireFox and installed it on my 1 GHz Asus Eee PC Netbook. I have to tell you that I am extremely alarmed by what I see. The very first thing that caught my eye was that although FireFox was describing this version as faster, it was noticeably slower on my lil’ netbook. That does NOT bode well for me. On top of this, I just plain hate deceitful advertising. My web pages were loading at least 1/2 speed.
What struck me next was the new interface. Why is it that developer’s ignore design? Why is it that when guy does one thing another guy has to follow suit? Since when does Mozilla jump into a “Monkey see, monkey do.” attitude. This is pure idiocy!
When Microsoft’s IE8 came out and misplaced the refresh/reload page button to the right side of the browser address bar, it was Internet Explorer’s death knell. This was such a huge user interface navigation mistake that it helped usher in a new age where FireFox became the predominant browser of choice because so many people were absolutely frustrated with the IE8 interface that moved everything around where no one was used to them.
Guess what? Mozilla does not want FireFox 4 to be a familar tool that works well, anymore. They have decided to follow suit and copy IE8′s pathetic user interface by hiding all the most often used controls in plain sight. Once again, the page reload button is relocated to the right of the browser’s URL address bar. This gives me great pause, to realize that corporations are so secure in their knowledge of what is best for us in terms of the human interface experience. So I wonder whether it will be Google Chrome or Opera that we migrate to?
Safari has already made the jump to a right side refresh/reload button, so I don’t think that they will ever be a factor in the browser wars until the iPhone becomes a significant web browsing platform. And it just may, they already dominate the smartphone market. Furthermore, I think that the impact of small device web browsing has not yet been felt. Mobile device web browsing is, afterall, not yet in the hands of everyone. Nor is anyone making it affordable for everyone, yet. But once someone realizes its potential, we will all be jumping on it because it is so convenient, in order to accommodate our growing digital lifestyle.
Why is placing the refresh/reload button on the other side of the address bar such a navigation nightmare? This practice is breaking simple user interface friendliness guidelines. The issue is not that the button has been moved to the other side of the browser bar, the issue is that the user interface has not been moved to the other side of the browser bar with it. The forward, back and reload buttons offer the most used rudimentary control over surfing. To separate any of these navigation devices simply decreases their convenience. To not understand this one aspect of the user’s navigation interface experience is quite simply shamefully stupid.
There will be those who will take issue with the last three lines in that last paragraph. Their argument will be that all a user has to do is type a return in the browser bar. But what they fail to realize is that not everyone is like them. Not everyone thinks or does everything the same way and the complete failure to either understand or provide for these alternate minded people is complete insanity.
Let’s face it, we have been doing things certain ways for years. People are accustomed to them. They are used to clicking buttons, they are used to finding all their navigation in the same area. It makes no matter that “Instead you can…” that is not an argument, that is an excuse. Navigation, whether on a web page interface, or in a software interface, should never be separated. Especially when it all performs a simple derivative of the same function (GOTO: back a page, same page or next page).
Developers are thinking logically while creative types are thinking creatively. For an anal mind to dictate how a user interface is setup without consulting a creative mind shows true lack of vision for the big picture. Straight out of the box, FireFox 4 not only fails to impress, it offends me. Don’t get me wrong, I am only speaking for me. But it does. It fails to take into consideration any alternate view of navigation or user friendliness. It separates the navigation buttons and discombobulates the system, completely. I, as a designer of friendly interactive web page navigation systems myself, consider this UI a sinful, evil thing. It amazes me that they would ever allow this interface to ship as it is.
OK, there it is, my first impression after downloading, installing and running the new version 4 of Mozilla’s FireFox. It just plain sucks. It looks like crap and it scares me because it makes assumptions on what I need and takes liberties with a user interface that worked. In my view, it is less useful and extremely unfriendly as a user interface. My web pages all load slower now, and that also ticks me off. I am not impressed.
That’s my first impression. FireFox 4 sucks. I hate it. But that is only after my first impression. Mozilla says that it is completely customizable. That will be my next post, can we fix this piece of crap? All it really needs is a few tweaks. Or is it completely broken?
March 25, 2011
Posted by domainating |
Brands, Computing, Devices, Graphic Design, User Interface eXperience, Web Design & Development | FireFox, firefox 4, mozilla, nav, navigation, UI, UIX, user friendliness, user friendly, user interface |
8 Comments
Well, my wife has had a little time to get used to how Outlook 2010 does things now. So this is a brief update on our impression of it…
My wife likes it, but has some issues. The same issues cause me to think that it is a worthless piece of crap.
- Old contacts from Windows Vista Mail were never imported. Not doing this automatically (or at least asking permission to) is just pure stupidity. What was the sense in transferring everything over from Vista in the first place? To have the old files, yes, but also to have the very same application data and configuration. Outlook 2010 is pathetic because it craps on the whole idea of maintaining a so-called “seamless” upgrade path. This is absolutely inexcusable and stands a testament to the absolute thoughtlessness and complete lack of vision of the entire Outlook development team.
- Multiple accounts?: Multiple Inboxes! This in itself is completely void of intelligence. The fact that Outlook has to have multiple inboxes for multiple email addresses and never incorporates them all into a streamlined universal inbox is beyond the realm of stupidity. This is yet another stupid task that should have been done completely automatically.
- Adding contacts is pretty awkward as well. You don’t get access to this function unless you have an email previewed. THEN you can add its contact and have access to the contacts. But not until you have an email cued-up somehow. Really? I mean, maybe the only reason I ran the damn program was to change Aunt Len’s address because she moved. And the social contacts is just in the way. My wife doesn’t participate in any social networking sites, so it is just in the way and confusing her.
Really Microsoft? With the release of Windows 7 I was finally ready to take you seriously, and more than just a necessary business toy that I was required to have and support. But Outlook 2010 can’t incorporate the simple email functionality that we have come to expect from every other email program in the world? C’MON, MAN! C’MON YOU MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION! Get with it.
I already started taking Microsoft seriously when I found that their hardware products were so damn good (XBOX, mice and keyboards). But I have still been waiting a very long time for them to develop any usable software products. With Windows 7 I thought that Microsoft had started producing software that actually worked, but they have completely dropped the ball with any other software packages they produce (Expression, Publisher and IE8/9 are direct examples of this ineptness). With Outlook 2010′s pathetic featureless release I don’t really expect Microsoft to ever get what users expect out of their computing experience.
March 7, 2011
Posted by domainating |
Apps, Brands, Business, Computing, Internet, Product Design, Software, The Human Condition, User Interface eXperience, Windows | email, lack of common sense, lack of ingenuity, lack of initiative, lack of vision, Outlook 2010, review, software, Windows 7 |
Leave a Comment
Recently, my wife Maria’s HP laptop battery went bad, and we think that toasted some chip when it got hot and the computer refused to boot properly. And of course you try everything to get the dang thing running again, so we invested a great deal of time just checking to make sure it was dead. Of course, the results were definite, and she had to replace that laptop, which was running Windows Vista. Although we originally went shopping for a cheap replacement, I think that despite the fact that her Vista based HP machine was actually a pretty expensive model, she couldn’t seem to get the features she needed with spending a few extra bucks by avoiding HP products in the hopes that her new Dell would be much more reliable (to say the very least, the dang HP didn’t even last a couple years).
As you know, when you buy a new computer it’s always a huge hassle reloading it with all the applications that you have used routinely over the last few years. Email is, of course, detrimental to business, and the Live Mail that had come with her new Windows 7 based laptop was apparently no longer downloading her mail to the server. On top of that, the simple spam detection, protection and deletion system which had previously worked so extremely well in Windows Vista Mail was apparently not working at all in the new Windows 7 laptop. Maria was spending all sorts of time deleting mail that the computer simply trashed for her, previously. And the mail server kept sending out warning messages about the size of her email box even though I finally got fed up with increasing her mailbox size and set it to infinite (we are talking about GBs of spam, here).
And spammers wonder why we hate them?
Maria had used the version of Outlook from Office for her email when she owned desktop computers previously, and Vista had come with a really nice “Mail” program for email that worked for her when she was on Vista. So, by the time all this trouble with her email started resurfacing every couple weeks we had no idea where her legal copy of Office 2007 went.
Now, of course we decided to buy a copy of Microsoft Office 2010 for Home and Student. Everywhere that I looked for this program online just showed the price and no write-up or package details. There weren’t even any reviews that I noticed. We had used other versions of Works and Office before, as well. So, when I went out shopping at the stores for the best price (as we were in a hurry to get this working and we didn’t have to wait for a package to arrive from Timbuktu), I was quite surprised to find that apparently Microsoft had changed the Office Home and Student edition and weren’t including Outlook in the package anymore. This was a pretty big deal because the reason she was buying it was to get Outlook and have Word, but without Outlook, that Home and Student bundle was pretty much worthless to her.
Now this was quite interesting, since I had some familiarity with the package. Although I don’t use it, Maria has almost always used it. And I had checked all sorts of sites, read descriptions, even visited the Microsoft Office website and read as much as I could about the package. So it was strange to me that when I arrived at Staples to start shopping for it, it was only then (right when I was staring at the actual product packaging) when I finally realized that Outlook didn’t even come with the Home & Student edition of Office 2007. Huh? We were only really buying it for email and it didn’t have it? Whoa. I guess Microsoft got smart about it and gave everyone a (really, really) crappy email client figuring that a business wouldn’t be able to handle such a pathetic program and they would all most certainly have to upgrade to a paid email client. Pretty smart, when you think of it. But I consider this type of smarts evil genius, you know what I am talking about? I mean, don’t give consumers who purchase a new Windows 7 based computer even a half-assed good email client? Win 7′s Mail Live client is absolutely pathetic. But that is what I am talking about, it’s evil genius.
Doesn’t Microsoft know that the car companies were sued for purposely engineering-in breakdowns on car parts? What ever happened to that suit, anyway? Oh yeah, we never heard anything about it after a while, did we? See? Evil genius. HP did the same thing with printer ink. I had to opt-out of that class action suit. Maybe the battery overheating and killing my wife’s Vista laptop was also an engineered issue. Absolute evil genius. I stand in awe of these fault-engineered computer time-bombs that can’t even last a couple years (but will always make it past the one-year warranty). A bow to the genius of these evil engineers.
Anyway, there was no way we were going to solve our email problem with the Office 2010 Home & Student edition. And Outlook, all by its lonesome, cost the same as the Home & Student: $120.00! We had to upgrade to the Home & Business version of Office 2010. I wound-up buying it at Staples for $180.00. It was the first place I looked, but I didn’t actually buy it until after searching the whole city for the best price because my DroidX’s Savvy Shopper app had just upgraded and wasn’t working.
I grabbed the product key from Staples since she already had Office 2010 preinstalled on her new Windows 7 Dell. I thought that the install would be a breeze because of this, and because I had already copied all of her email contacts from her Vista machine hard drive. But apparently, Outlook 2010 doesn’t even look to see if there are any contacts to import from Vista Mail? LOL… and of course, that lead to more confusion!
Then we go into the issue of the Outlook upgrade. As it has been updated for social media and community networks, just getting the dang contacts in there is apparently a chore because everything has changed. I’m hoping I can fix it by importing her contacts from the old Vista Mail program somehow, but she seems to be making do anyway now that she has spent a terrific amount of time on the computer figuring everything out. She keeps showing me the computer when I don’t have any glasses on, and I already hate Outlook so I can’t make heads or tails of anything, yet.
She should slow down so that I can jump-in to take a look soon, though.
But all this really makes you think about how badly these companies are gouging us. All this hassle just for a convenient, reliable email client for business? But when do we stop getting reamed in the butt for it? We really are dependent on technology these days, aren’t we? It is because of email that Maria needs to communicate with her students that she had to run out and buy a new computer in the first place. Otherwise she could have gone without. Computers were supposed to help us and ease our work process, not make everything more complicated, expensive and laborious. Lately these hardware and software companies have just been cramming it up our boots and I am getting pretty sore about it. Damn evil geniuses.
February 25, 2011
Posted by domainating |
Brands, Business, Computing, Internet, Product Design, Software, The Human Condition, User Interface eXperience, Windows | email, evil, evil genius, Microsoft, Outlook 2010, software, upgrade, upgrading, Windows 7 email, Windows 7 Outlook, Windows Vista Mail |
Leave a Comment
Note:
Originally this post was the first one posted at my BApps blog for business application reviews (blog.bapps.com). There was a lowball offer for the domain of $200.00, and I need the money, so I went ahead and put it up for auction. BApps.com will be sold at auction to the highest bidder, as the reserve price has already been met. The auction for BApps.com will conclude on May/05/11 @ 05:51 AM Eastern Standard Time. You can access the BApps.com domain name auction at Sedo. This blog entry was imported with the rest of them. I will continue blogging about software here in this blog unless and until I find a better alternative home.
Posted:
I have been playing with my DroidX for a couple of months now and notice that there are lots of apps (I’ve downloaded so many android apps that I can’t believe I’m not swimming around in digital media), but there aren’t many resources for application reviews and such. Since I am a businessman that is particularly interested in the best applications for his business, I’ve decided to start this blog site in an effort to fill that need.
I already have done this before for the android platform, at http://blog.widgetdroid.com/, but that blog is specific to the droid market. In my home business, I have 2 Windows based desktops that I try to use as private servers (1 is XP, the other is Windows 7), another 3 desktop computers all running different OSes (Mac, Linux & Amiga) for compatibility reasons, my work laptop, an EeePC I use for email, an older laptop for Linux experimentation, and then there’s a basic Trakfone LG camera phone, and my wife and I each have a DroidX smartphone. Maria has a computer for her business as well. Plus, there is even an iPad in the house, if we need it. All these things run apps and connect to the internet.
In fact, we recently had a strange dilemma where she was having all kinds of trouble with the Windows 7 “Live Mail” program, which is apparently a huge piece of crap. And as she had previously loved Outlook, I went out to get her a copy of Outlook which became a whole new problem. In fact, this story will probably be my very next entry in the blog.
But as you know, home business or not, we can’t screw-around with applications trying to learn them or just to get them to work according to our expectations, business requires working people and when you are self-employed you cannot rely on anyone else.
Which is the reason I’ve decided to start this blog. Although I will have fun reviewing the apps I use on the android platform, even our familiar computer software distributions and packaged bundles are changing so fast and radically to keep up with the fast pace of technology that there just isn’t enough good reliable information out there.
Hopefully I can not only review some of the apps I use on the computer as well as on our smartphones and iPad, but also offer some tips on how to use them better, easier or smarter. It certainly does become a struggle when an application you have used and counted on for years suddenly changes its entire format to incorporate a new technology such as social media and everything about it suddenly looks like Greek when you install the new update.
That’s what this blog is all about, I hope you will find it useful.
Thanks…
-Doug
February 25, 2011
Posted by domainating |
Apps, Brands, Business, Computing, Devices, Internet, Media, Product Design, social media, Software, User Interface eXperience, Windows | android, android 2, Apple, applications, apps, business, iOS, Macintosh, reviews, software, tools, utilities, widgets, Windows |
Leave a Comment
I am having a heck of a time locating graphics and organizing images. I tend to take too many photos because my family almost will never pose for a shot. Plus, it’s always better to see them with a real actual smile as I catch them laugh at someone else’s joke. But timing these moments is difficult, everything has to be right and no one can be flinging their head back or rolling on the floor (which my son does for affect).
I also love to take photos of nature and although I do make the attempt, wildlife doesn’t like to cooperate much. I have never had a pheasant stop for a pose, those birds are actually quite stealthy. And when the deer do stop out of curiosity, they have already made cover. Mother nature just doesn’t like to cooperate.
To make matters worse, I am a graphic/web designer by trade. I design all sorts of web logos for my domains, websites logos and advertisements for others, and I almost exclusively work in the Photoshop Document (*.psd) or Adobe Illustrator (*.ai) file formats until I am ready to publish something. The trouble with this is that once saved, I never see a thumbnail when I am browsing the file structure in Windows Explorer. Instead, I see a worthless advertisement of the logo for whatever the default program is that I use to load for the image even if I am trying to view the thumbnails.
I can see the *.psd thumbnails in Photoshop when I am looking for them, but then I am trying to open them up or save them. Plus, this is an extremely limited browser. Adobe does offer Bridge with my Master Creative Suite, but Bridge suffers from the same drawbacks as Photoshop, it has a high memory requirement and it is an extremely poor replacement for the OS’s file/directory structure explorer (AKA: “Explorer” or “Windows Explorer”).
Bridge is a good gallery program, but when I am trying to find something somewhere on my hard drive and I need a visual cue, it sucks because it is so proprietary, lacks decent search features, drains the memory from other programs, and since I use a lot of other programs (except when in Photoshop), this thereby makes my system unstable.
In order to accomplish what I need to do, I need to be able to see .psd files in the OS while I am searching through my archives normally, anyway.
Shortly after I got this computer (which is a 64-bit Vista based machine), I installed the Photoshop CS3 Master collection and I thought for a little while that I could actually see my PSD files. I was so happy. Since then, I have installed all sorts of other graphics tools, utilities and picture viewers. I kind of have to, Adobe no longer supports every new format in the world, especially since my Photoshop is a couple versions old, now. And not everything new asks for permission before taking over the default file loading stations upon installation.
Installers and updaters are also notorious for leaving icons on my desktop, which is another pet peeve of mine. But even if I haven’t given explicit instructions to any program not to install shortcuts or not to change my file extension default loading applications because it hasn’t asked, it should always default to “No” unless it asks. They don’t. And these companies will continue to piss me off (Microsoft, Apple, Google, Broadcom, DivX) by littering my desktop with crap without permission on every single update. So, since the big guys don’t follow the common sense rules of file installation and updating, all these little guys think that they have to get their brand out there are well, and the way they do it is by not asking for permission to change your default application settings, and doing it anyway.
Why aren’t Adobe format files showing a preview thumbnail when I am saving a preview thumbnail with each and every save? I can’t say that they are making everyone buy another product just to see PSD and AI thumbnails since I am actually sure that I used to see such thumbnails. But how to I get things back to that state?
It is just plain impossible to reorganize my photos and images without being able to view them because when I need to do it is when I come across them and see they are out of place through my normal day as I am using the OS. When I try to do it on purpose, I am systematically going through folders and never run into anything out of place.
Let’s face it, if Adobe is offering anything less than what Microsoft is designed to be (to say, sell another product), they would actually be corrupting the OS. Even though everyone else does it, Adobe usually takes the high road in this case. So, I don’t think they are the culprit.
Argh.
How do I take my OS back?
January 13, 2011
Posted by domainating |
Advertising and Marketing, Brands, Computing, Graphic Design, Logo Design, Media, Photography, Product Design, Search, The Human Condition | Adobe, bad behaviour, Brands, Bridge, cataloging, corrupting the OS, default application, default file loader, design, directory structure, file extension, file structure, illustrator, installers, litter, organization, OS, permissions, Photoshop, previews, thumbnails, UI, UIX, updaters, user, user interface, Windows, Windows explorer |
Leave a Comment
I finally figured out what I hate about the DROIDX: The Android Contacts app sucks because it refuses to load the last category loaded on start like all the real widgets do. Instead it shows up with ALL the contacts… and it isn’t likely I will use it to contact anyone with email because it just isn’t very good at email with that touch screen keypad.
Google & Motorola: I did NOT get my DroidX for email, I have a dozen computers for all occasions, they ALL work better for email. I got it to be a phone (a smart phone with camera, camcorder, a portable HD and all the PDA doo-dads with some web access). I sure as heck won’t use it for email. To polute the contact list with emails I never contact directly from Twitter & Facebook is insanity. Make it useful, default to showing PHONE NUMBERS (which I use the phone for, not emails I never write), preferably my favorites.
Fix that contact list and it should be the perfect smartphone. But this is a pure design fail in the software development department. What do you think we use phones for, MAINLY?
It isn’t a reason to not get a DroidX, but it still doesn’t change the fact that the Contacts app sucks and seems to be put together as a very stupid afterthought. Google, Motorola, do you actually USE your own products? The Contacts app is pathetic.
The best would be to pick a default category for the contacts to load to. That makes sense, or at least load the favorite (starred) contacts by default (as mentioned), but loading nearly 3,000 contacts (the “all of them” category) is a waste of my time and the Droid’s energy.
This is a geek’s “C’MON MAN!”
The alternate is that I can’t load my actual Twitter Facebook, etc… accounts, and that sucks too.
C’MON, MAN!
December 31, 2010
Posted by domainating |
Brands, Computing, Devices, Google, Internet, Product Design, Sales, Social Communities, social media | android, apps, C'mon Man, contact app, contacts, corporate stupidity, design fail, droid, Droid X, DroidX, Google, Motorola, Product Design, product development, smart phone, stupidity, thoughtless products, widgets |
Leave a Comment