<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Domainating: Brands, Art &amp; Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainating.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainating.com</link>
	<description>artist/illustrator/designer/webmaster/copywriter/videographer/optimizer/promoter/ad-man</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:13:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Back In Action by Back In Action &#124; www.1080p.it</title>
		<link>http://domainating.com/2012/01/14/back-in-action/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Back In Action &#124; www.1080p.it]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainating.com/?p=288#comment-405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the original article here: Back In Action    Posted by admin at 2:03 am Tagged with: advertising, art, artist, business, design, development, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original article here: Back In Action    Posted by admin at 2:03 am Tagged with: advertising, art, artist, business, design, development, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FireFox 4 First Impression: It Sucks by Tim</title>
		<link>http://domainating.com/2011/03/25/firefox-4-first-impression/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainating.com/?p=236#comment-300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can make your own browser.  You can start with the firefox 3.6 codebase(which is open source) and continue on from there.  Its called a fork, and it happens all the time in open source circles.

I hate the new cache system and yes, the fact that they feel the need to &quot;look and feel&quot; like IE.  Firefox was the trend setter! it brought tabbed browsing into the norm, as well as popup blocking.  Now it appears to be trying to play catchup with a failed browser!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can make your own browser.  You can start with the firefox 3.6 codebase(which is open source) and continue on from there.  Its called a fork, and it happens all the time in open source circles.</p>
<p>I hate the new cache system and yes, the fact that they feel the need to &#8220;look and feel&#8221; like IE.  Firefox was the trend setter! it brought tabbed browsing into the norm, as well as popup blocking.  Now it appears to be trying to play catchup with a failed browser!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FireFox 4 First Impression: It Sucks by domainating</title>
		<link>http://domainating.com/2011/03/25/firefox-4-first-impression/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[domainating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 09:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainating.com/?p=236#comment-279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One guy in our group has mentioned that we should write our own browser, indicating that it isn&#039;t that difficult.  Then, if we could get enough support we could at least have some sort of input on the web standards.  

I think the place to do this, is in the mobile phone/device/tablet market where browsing kind of sucks already.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One guy in our group has mentioned that we should write our own browser, indicating that it isn&#8217;t that difficult.  Then, if we could get enough support we could at least have some sort of input on the web standards.  </p>
<p>I think the place to do this, is in the mobile phone/device/tablet market where browsing kind of sucks already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FireFox 4 First Impression: It Sucks by domainating</title>
		<link>http://domainating.com/2011/03/25/firefox-4-first-impression/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[domainating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 09:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainating.com/?p=236#comment-278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, the lack of usability in the UI that I speak of can&#039;t be fixed without adding an extra toolbar, and I honestly think that all add-on toolbars suck.  

FF4 had been in beta for quite a while, which is why I am so amazed that they would allow such glaring errors to slip through (unless someone in charge is deliberately sabotaging the project).

I can&#039;t find any write-ups on the security issues, though.  Got any links?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the lack of usability in the UI that I speak of can&#8217;t be fixed without adding an extra toolbar, and I honestly think that all add-on toolbars suck.  </p>
<p>FF4 had been in beta for quite a while, which is why I am so amazed that they would allow such glaring errors to slip through (unless someone in charge is deliberately sabotaging the project).</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t find any write-ups on the security issues, though.  Got any links?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FireFox 4 First Impression: It Sucks by e+C</title>
		<link>http://domainating.com/2011/03/25/firefox-4-first-impression/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e+C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 06:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainating.com/?p=236#comment-277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sucks, and it sucks hard.

The problem for me wasn&#039;t the interface itself, which if you&#039;re already used to customizing ff - isn&#039;t a hardship.

The biggest problem by FAR is:  It&#039;s handling of almost anything is 1/4 the speed of 3.6.  4.0 has TERRIBLE packagecontainer.exe handling, which pretty much leaves anything flash based off the table as far as usability.  This isn&#039;t all that big of an issue if you never go to social networking sites, and your entire time on the web is looking at plain text. html pages, but the reality is we no longer live in that world.  Try playing Farmville or any similar web based flash game which requires packets sent to / from your client.  When it&#039;s not going into 3 - 5 minute lock ups and freezes, it&#039;s just siting there unresponsive, trying to figure out what to do.  3.6 was instant... this is a nightmare.  &quot;It&#039;s a known problem&quot; is a terrible excuse, as they had plenty of time in beta to work these issues out.  They never should have released this, it&#039;s just absolute untested, loosely coded shite.  ff4.0 has security loopholes a mile wide and they left out the critical redirect security fixes right out of the gate. How could this have possibly been missed? 

I doubt I can trust these clowns any longer - to make a viable browser that works efficiently and has security covered.  Sad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sucks, and it sucks hard.</p>
<p>The problem for me wasn&#8217;t the interface itself, which if you&#8217;re already used to customizing ff &#8211; isn&#8217;t a hardship.</p>
<p>The biggest problem by FAR is:  It&#8217;s handling of almost anything is 1/4 the speed of 3.6.  4.0 has TERRIBLE packagecontainer.exe handling, which pretty much leaves anything flash based off the table as far as usability.  This isn&#8217;t all that big of an issue if you never go to social networking sites, and your entire time on the web is looking at plain text. html pages, but the reality is we no longer live in that world.  Try playing Farmville or any similar web based flash game which requires packets sent to / from your client.  When it&#8217;s not going into 3 &#8211; 5 minute lock ups and freezes, it&#8217;s just siting there unresponsive, trying to figure out what to do.  3.6 was instant&#8230; this is a nightmare.  &#8220;It&#8217;s a known problem&#8221; is a terrible excuse, as they had plenty of time in beta to work these issues out.  They never should have released this, it&#8217;s just absolute untested, loosely coded shite.  ff4.0 has security loopholes a mile wide and they left out the critical redirect security fixes right out of the gate. How could this have possibly been missed? </p>
<p>I doubt I can trust these clowns any longer &#8211; to make a viable browser that works efficiently and has security covered.  Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FireFox 4 First Impression: It Sucks by Mark</title>
		<link>http://domainating.com/2011/03/25/firefox-4-first-impression/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 11:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainating.com/?p=236#comment-263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree. I hate the new interface. What is a good alternative?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree. I hate the new interface. What is a good alternative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BApps.com up for Auction by BApps.com up for Auction « Domainating: Brands, Art &#38; Content &#124; Domain registration always get the best</title>
		<link>http://domainating.com/2011/05/01/bapps-auction/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BApps.com up for Auction « Domainating: Brands, Art &#38; Content &#124; Domain registration always get the best]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainating.com/2011/05/01/bapps-up-for-auction#comment-260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &amp;#1072t th&amp;#1110&amp;#1109 calculate t&amp;#959 look &amp;#1110nt&amp;#959 th&amp;#1077 rest: BApps.com up f&amp;#959r Auction « Domainating: Brands, Art &amp; M&amp;#1072k&amp;#1077 &amp;#1088&amp;#406&amp;#1077&amp;#107... Also of interest:Domain Name Auction – 200 Premium Domains on Auction – ADI News &#8230;Domain [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &amp;#1072t th&amp;#1110&amp;#1109 calculate t&amp;#959 look &amp;#1110nt&amp;#959 th&amp;#1077 rest: BApps.com up f&amp;#959r Auction « Domainating: Brands, Art &amp; M&amp;#1072k&amp;#1077 &amp;#1088&amp;#406&amp;#1077&amp;#107&#8230; Also of interest:Domain Name Auction – 200 Premium Domains on Auction – ADI News &#8230;Domain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FireFox 4 First Impression: It Sucks by MikeH</title>
		<link>http://domainating.com/2011/03/25/firefox-4-first-impression/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 02:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainating.com/?p=236#comment-257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to agree with the 1st poster. It SUCKS!
I had just finished a fresh XP system reinstall and went to reinstall Firefox from Mozilla.  The offered Firefox 4 so I installed it.  Like previously said, the interface is pathetic. I spent an hour trying to figure out how to set it up like older Firefox versions. You can&#039;t.  The worst part, as also previously stated, it&#039;s filthy slooooow.  For a while I thought something was wrong with my computer.  Frustrated, I uninstalled FF4 and reinstalled FF3.6.17.  That great FF interface is back and so is the fast surfing speeds I&#039;m used to.  Mozilla got it 100% wrong with FF4.  What a shame!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with the 1st poster. It SUCKS!<br />
I had just finished a fresh XP system reinstall and went to reinstall Firefox from Mozilla.  The offered Firefox 4 so I installed it.  Like previously said, the interface is pathetic. I spent an hour trying to figure out how to set it up like older Firefox versions. You can&#8217;t.  The worst part, as also previously stated, it&#8217;s filthy slooooow.  For a while I thought something was wrong with my computer.  Frustrated, I uninstalled FF4 and reinstalled FF3.6.17.  That great FF interface is back and so is the fast surfing speeds I&#8217;m used to.  Mozilla got it 100% wrong with FF4.  What a shame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FireFox 4 First Impression: It Sucks by domainating</title>
		<link>http://domainating.com/2011/03/25/firefox-4-first-impression/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[domainating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainating.com/?p=236#comment-249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The user interface (UI) is the perfect example of piss-poor usabilty (user navigation friendliness).  

Did some idiot come from Microsoft to take over the FireFox project?  Because this version 4 smacks of MS stupidity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The user interface (UI) is the perfect example of piss-poor usabilty (user navigation friendliness).  </p>
<p>Did some idiot come from Microsoft to take over the FireFox project?  Because this version 4 smacks of MS stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FireFox 4 First Impression: It Sucks by greenaprons</title>
		<link>http://domainating.com/2011/03/25/firefox-4-first-impression/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[greenaprons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainating.com/?p=236#comment-248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[most of what you are talking about is over my head... but... what isn&#039;t over my head is the fact that FF4 sucks!

it is the little things... tabs at top of screen which makes me have to do more work to get to them and looking at the toolbars. Why do I need to scan my eyes over all that visual noise when I just need to change from one tab to another.

Home! it is on the left now! reload is is next to the URL box (which I keep hitting that Star) and back/forward is still on the upper right? does this make sense? no. Scatter me all over the page. 

If I click on &quot;Y&quot;ahoo it takes me to India! India!!!!! huh? India?

I just hate this layout. How come no one ever asks us?

Yes, I too hate FF4! I asked them how I uninstall it and go back to the previous revision... I can&#039;t! even if I could I would have to pay someone to do it for me!

I get sewing, I don&#039;t get computers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most of what you are talking about is over my head&#8230; but&#8230; what isn&#8217;t over my head is the fact that FF4 sucks!</p>
<p>it is the little things&#8230; tabs at top of screen which makes me have to do more work to get to them and looking at the toolbars. Why do I need to scan my eyes over all that visual noise when I just need to change from one tab to another.</p>
<p>Home! it is on the left now! reload is is next to the URL box (which I keep hitting that Star) and back/forward is still on the upper right? does this make sense? no. Scatter me all over the page. </p>
<p>If I click on &#8220;Y&#8221;ahoo it takes me to India! India!!!!! huh? India?</p>
<p>I just hate this layout. How come no one ever asks us?</p>
<p>Yes, I too hate FF4! I asked them how I uninstall it and go back to the previous revision&#8230; I can&#8217;t! even if I could I would have to pay someone to do it for me!</p>
<p>I get sewing, I don&#8217;t get computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

